This article outlines the reasons why the MARTIF standard has
utilized complex, and yet powerful, SGML structures in order to
preserve and communicate the information and functionalities present
in many terminological databases. As a counter to this complexity,
it has proposed the introduction of three levels of "blindness",
which would further specify data structures and content, standardize
classification practice, and encourage groups to adopt standard
subsets of data categories.
The authors do not, however, pretend that MARTIF is the ultimate
tool for interchanging data. As has been the case throughout the
development of MARTIF, they invite comment from those who have
ideas for simplifying the standard and urge them to propose solutions
that are more elegant while retaining the power and flexibility
of the current standard. Everyone is invited to present alternative
suggestions in public for a rather than suppressing (or perhaps
not even developing) alternative solutions, which does not contribute
to constructive debate. It is, after all, easy to discuss the
pros and cons of MARTIF because the entire standard is a matter
of public record. It is unfortunate that some critics are very
ready to point out perceived shortcomings, but they have in many
cases been unwilling to share their specific ideas for improving
the standard. This approach is counterproductive because the work
group has been highly flexible in incorporating many good ideas
and constructive criticisms in order to strengthen the standard.
|