Information in this page copyright 2001 Brigham
Young University Department of Linguistics. Permission to duplicate
this material for non-commercial academic purposes is freely given, provided
BYU is noted as the copyright holder.
This page last updated May 22, 2001 by Daniel Roundy, dqr@ttt.org
| |
People, N-S
| A-H | I-M
| N-S | T-Z |
- Peirce, Charles Saunders
-
Charles Saunders Pierce was born in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the
son of a Harvard mathematics professor. He received his education
at Harvard. In 1861 he began studying pendulums. He also studied light
waves and Boolean algebra. He lectured at Harvard and at Johns Hopkins
University from 1864 to 1884 in logic and philosophy. He was removed
from teaching at Johns Hopkins because of his abrasive personality.
However, he continued to give some lectures at Harvard. These lectures
developed into pragmatism, for which Peirce is most famous.
Peirce's first paper on pragmatism (although it was not yet referred
to as pragmatism) was "How to make our ideas clear" in 1877. It was
introduced as a method for making meanings of words and utterances
more understandable. This philosophy held that objects are only significant
by how they are used, and not in and of themselves. The philosophers
William James and John Dewey built upon the work of Peirce in pragmatics;
however, Peirce tried to distance his own work from that of James,
as he did not agree with some of William James' ideas on the subject.
Peirce studied everything he studied in relation to semiotics, or
signs. He understood the sign relationship to be three-way. According
to Peirce, a sign cannot be understood to hold a certain meaning unless
we think it does. Hence, there are three parts, the sign, the object
being signified, and our thoughts that connect them. We can also deduce
meanings by applying our previous knowledge and suppositions to the
available signs and items signified, and grow closer and closer to
a clear sign and signified relationship.
Information gathered from:
- Pike, Kenneth
-
Kenneth Pike was born in Woodstock, Connecticut in 1912. He received
his BA from Gordon College. In reading a biography of Hudson Taylor
while in school, Pike was inspired to become a missionary, and he
joined with a new group that would later become the Summer Institute
of Linguistics and the Wycliffe Bible Translators. As a member of
this group, he helped with the translation of the New Testament into
Mixtec. Pike pursued his Ph.D. in Linguistics at the University of
Michigan. In his involvement with the Summer Institutes of the Linguistic
Society of America during this time, he studied under Bloomfield and
Sapir, and also met several American Structuralists, including Harris,
Trager, and Hocket. In 1942, Pike completed his Ph.D. and became the
first president of the Summer Institute of Linguistics (SIL), where
he continued until 1979. SIL grew a great deal during his presidency,
expanding its work to over 50 countries and becoming well-known for
its scholarly work as well. Pike served on the faculty of the University
of Michigan from 1948 until 1978, and served as the president of the
Linguistics Society of America in 1961. Pike considers his entire
life's work as service to God, and not as anything of himself.
Pike's work includes many different areas of interest and a large
variety of publications. He studied in depth at different times in
his life phonetics, grammar, human behavior, and tagmemics. One of
his significant contributions is the coining of the words "etic" and
"emic." These words are taken from the endings of the words "phonetic"
and "phonemic." "etic" refers to the outsider view of a language or
culture, while "emic" refers to the views of those who are a part
of that language group or culture. Although these terms are not common
in linguistics, they have been used extensively in other disciplines.
Pike has contributed a great deal to the literature of the linguistics
field, having written some 150 articles and 20 books in various areas,
just a few of which are listed below.
Some major works:
- Phonetics (1943)
- "Grammatical prerequisites for phonemic analysis"(1947)
- "A problem in morphology-syntax division"(1949)
- Language in Relation to a Unified Theory of the Structure of
Human Behavior (1950s)
- Grammatical Analysis(1952) (co-authored by his wife, Evelyn)
- Rhetoric: Discovery and Change (1970) (coauthored with
Richard E. Young and Alton L. Becker)
- Linguistic Concepts(1982)
-
-
Information gathered from:
- Asher, R.E., Editor in Chief. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language
and Linguistics. New York: Pergamon Press.
- Wycliffe Bible Translators, Inc. (1999). Biographical Sketch
of Dr. Kenneth Pike: Ken Pike--God's Scholar. Available: http://www.wycliffe.org/history/KPike.htm
-
-
-
-
Some Useful Web Sites:
- Plato
-
Plato was born in Athens to Ariston and Perictione, both of high
families in Greece. At first, Plato was interested in politics, but
not agreeing with the current political situation in Athens, he instead
became a follower of Socrates. Plato was present when Socrates was
killed by the government, and shortly thereafter fled Greece for a
time. The Academy in Athens was founded by Plato in 387 BC. Here,
philosophy, politics, mathematics, biology, astronomy, and other subjects
were taught. Plato also went to Sicily a few times to instruct Donysius
the Younger, but was unsuccessful there. He returned to Athens, and
he taught at the Academy until his death around 348 or 347 BC. Plato's
philosophy has had a monumental influence on modern thought. The following
ideas of Plato have specific impact on the field of Linguistics.
Plato claimed that nothing on earth is real. He believed that everything
we see here on earth is just an imperfect representation of a real
thing that exists in the divine mind, or the world of the forms. Platonic
thought is now the basis of western philosophy. That doesn't mean
that everyone agrees with it, but everyone is either based with it
or against it, so it affects all aspects of our philosophy.
Plato presented a Socratic dialog that presented the question of
physis vs. nomos. Physis referred to the idea that items and concepts,
etc. in a language have names that correspond to their very nature.
Nomos referred to the idea that the names of concepts and ideas, etc.
are arbitrary, and depend on an agreed upon convention. Plato fell
on the physis side of the debate, and others throughout history have
fallen on either side or in various points in between.
Information gathered from:
- Melby, Alan. (class lecture--BYU)
- "Plato," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2000. http://encarta.msn.com
© 1997-2000 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
- de Saussure, Ferdinand
-
Ferdinand de Saussure is known as the Father of Structuralism. He
is best known today for Cours de linguistique generale, which
was actually written by his collegues at the University of Geneva
from notes his students had taken on his lectures.
De Saussure was interested in languages early in his life. By age
15, he had learned Greek, French, German, English, and Latin, and
at that age he also wrote an essay on languages. Being from a family
of natural scientists, De Saussure began his education at the University
of Geneva studying the natural sciences. He was there a year, and
then convinced his parents to allow him to go to Leipzig to study
linguistics.
In Leipzig, de Saussure studied linguistics for the next 4 years,
leaving for two semesters to study in Berlin. In December of 1878
at age 21, Saussure published his Memoir on the Primitive System
of Vowels in Indo-European Languages. This work proposed the existance
of a sound in Proto-Indo-European that later developed into different
vowels in different languages. It answered many questions linguists
had had at the time concerning ablaut in these languages, and it was
received very well. In 1880, Saussure returned to Leipzig to defend
his thesis on the use of the generative case in Sanskrit. He returned
to France, where he taught various languages and linguistics for the
next 11 years. In 1891, Saussure was offered a position at the University
of Geneva, and he returned to Switzerland, where he taught Sanskrit
and historical linguistics. He married there and had two sons. He
wrote very little toward the end of his life.
After Saussure's death, two of his collegues, Charles Bally and Albert
Sechehaye, put together the lecture notes of many of his students
to consolidate Saussure's linguistic thought in one book, Cours
de linguistique generale. This is the work Saussure is best known
for (although he himself didn't even write it), and it brings up many
topics that we still use today. Saussure distinguished between what
he called "langue", or the framework of language that people have
in their minds, and "parole", which refers to actual speech. He noted
that the purpose of linguistics was to study and understand langue.
Saussure noted the differences between signified and signifier, where
signified refers to the actual object that is represented,
and signifier to the word we use for it. He also made the distinction
between synchrony and diachrony, synchrony being the study of a language
at a single point in time, and diachrony being the study of a language
as it changes over time. Finally, he distinguished syntagmatic studies
from paradigmatic studies, where a syntagmatic structure is linear,
and a paradigmatic structure includes various relations based on grammar
and semantics.
Major work: Course in General Linguistics.
Information gathered from:
- Asher, R.E., Editor in Chief. 1994. The Encyclopedia of Language
and Linguistics. New York: Pergamon Press.
- Culler, Jonathan. 1986. Ferdinand de Saussure. Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
-
-
Some Useful Web Sites:
| Home | Concepts
| People | Events
| Further reading |
|